
He shot himself, and people are going 'It was a public execution' - er ... whut?!
It was a public SELF-execution, yes, but I really don't see how it's the police's fault.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2010, 12:19,
archived)
It was a public SELF-execution, yes, but I really don't see how it's the police's fault.

he sat with the gun to his head.
They tasered him, knowing this would mean he'd probably end up shooting himself.
What got me was, in the morning they were saying they DIDN'T taser him (with accompanying 'expert' on the news explaining why they didn't taser him.)
By the afternoon they admitted they had
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2010, 12:31,
archived)
They tasered him, knowing this would mean he'd probably end up shooting himself.
What got me was, in the morning they were saying they DIDN'T taser him (with accompanying 'expert' on the news explaining why they didn't taser him.)
By the afternoon they admitted they had

they'd get shit either way. if they didn't taser him, Moat's bro would be saying "why didn't you taser him - it would have stopped him" and since they did, it's now a "public execution".
it's pretty cut n' dried that he was a murderer, so I don't really see what the fuss is about.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2010, 12:33,
archived)
it's pretty cut n' dried that he was a murderer, so I don't really see what the fuss is about.

it always does
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2010, 12:56,
archived)