b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10378382 (Thread)

# This is all very well until you want to charge your phone or watch telly and you can't
because you don't have a regular source of power because you've run out of coal and it's not windy enough for the windmill/night so the solar cells aren't working.

If you want to live into the next century in the way you have become accustomed to, you will need nuclear power.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 12:59, archived)
# I'm not proposing to shut off all nuclear reactors immediately
but to make an effort in exploiting any renewable resource we can in order to do so as soon as possible. The technology for fully replacing nuclear power is already there. Let's build offshore wind parks, solar farms and pump storages instead of planning new / extending the lifespan of old nuclear plants!

Also, as a response to your arguments: we've already reached the peak of uranium mining; at this rate, we'll run out of uranium faster than out of coal. And recent studies show that nuclear plants aren't flexible enough for the needs of the modern electricity market. You can't just power them up or down, it takes days. It'd be far more effective to use fast-switchable windmills and power storages (there's still plenty of room in Scandinavia for some high-lying new lakes).
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 13:23, archived)
# Tidal power is consistent
Some days it might not be as windy as others. That's why they're building turbines at sea. But you don't get days when there is no tide.

Drax is a coal fired power station, and produces almost 4GW, generating 7% of the supply. It can consume up to 9 million tons of coal per year.

The proposed Severn Barrage will generate more than double the power and requires no fuel whatsoever. Put one across all the major estuaries.

Plus then there are domestic waste incinerators providing NIMBYs let them get built instead of complaining about the toxins that are actually filtered. All of the incinerators in the country combined release less toxins per year than one single bonfire on Nov 5th. Plus it would get shut of a lot of landfill.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 13:33, archived)
# one of many other forms of renewable energy we could harness, yes.
And then there's geothermal energy, for example. Other technologies are in development right now e.g. salinity gradient power. We could fully replace fission by the 2020s if we just decided that we want to.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 13:43, archived)
# Then there's
micro-generation. Your own windmill, solar panels etc. Not viable in built up areas, but still an option. It's still a bit expensive for now, but it'll come down in price. However, then the government will introduce a domestic generation duty.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 13:54, archived)
# It makes sense in the UK at any rate, what with us being an island and all.
I think there's an island in the highlands that's powered by tidal.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 13:46, archived)
# There's one in France
that's been on the go almost 50 years, and generates 600GWh per year.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 13:51, archived)