So, your idea to add 50% more page-weight, in one single animation
was all part of the plan?
( ,
Fri 27 May 2011, 14:32,
archived)
Nah
The 4MB is an observation, this page is hardly light, so all the whining about mobile phones and stuff, well it has merit but its hardly a 10 fold increase.
But still, I cocked up anyway for some reason.
( ,
Fri 27 May 2011, 14:39,
archived)
But still, I cocked up anyway for some reason.
anyone looking at b3ta on a mobile phone
is asking for fucking enormous data charges and frankly deserves what they get. but there are people on capped broadband and b3ta alone can use up quite a bit of that.
plus i tend to feel it's just simple reasonable manners to optimise something as far as possible. alas, they raised the file-size "limit" from an arbitrary 50k to an equally arbitrary 100k, so everyone posts pictures that are a WHOLE 100k big!!!! there's no craftsmanship anymore.
( ,
Fri 27 May 2011, 15:01,
archived)
plus i tend to feel it's just simple reasonable manners to optimise something as far as possible. alas, they raised the file-size "limit" from an arbitrary 50k to an equally arbitrary 100k, so everyone posts pictures that are a WHOLE 100k big!!!! there's no craftsmanship anymore.
Its funny
because I optimise all my jpegs and pngs. Even thinking about efficient packet loading.
( ,
Fri 27 May 2011, 15:05,
archived)