
The trick with Japanese horror isn't flashing a big monster on the screen or some psycho with a mask and knife; it builds up the tension so much it's almost unbearable, and that gets you so much better than, say, Jason Voorhees.
( ,
Mon 30 May 2011, 22:49,
archived)

Not just LOL LOOK WE DID THIS REALLY FAST AND LOUD, JUMPCUT A LOAD OF FLASHING IMAGES TOGETHER AND THREW BLOOD ALL OVER THE PLACE.
I think a new category should be made, to encompass the travesties like Saw - probably the most pointless and unnecessarily graphic franchise I have yet to come across. I watched a 'making of' that had the production crew discussing the direction of the new film prior to storyboarding - what a bunch of cynical, arrogant cunts.
( ,
Mon 30 May 2011, 23:00,
archived)
I think a new category should be made, to encompass the travesties like Saw - probably the most pointless and unnecessarily graphic franchise I have yet to come across. I watched a 'making of' that had the production crew discussing the direction of the new film prior to storyboarding - what a bunch of cynical, arrogant cunts.

( ,
Mon 30 May 2011, 23:37,
archived)

Low budget British film that packs more tension into the event by showing less, thus extracting more as the viewer is more involved.
Your imagination can produce far better/worse horrors than a bloke Hollywood dressed up in a rubber suit. This is why Hammer Horror films still work today. Imply the threat with shadows and sound effects and let the audience do the rest.
5. Profit!
( ,
Tue 31 May 2011, 1:05,
archived)
Your imagination can produce far better/worse horrors than a bloke Hollywood dressed up in a rubber suit. This is why Hammer Horror films still work today. Imply the threat with shadows and sound effects and let the audience do the rest.
5. Profit!