Funny thing is, it is.And with no wiggle room either. It can be said that he did not use the full range on any single image in that set, but together they fit in with the model as he defined it.
(
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sat 18 Jun 2011, 5:38,
archived)
Indeed! Pesky things with their silly corners and shit.Mind you, what I've done to it might have broken the Cubism in it.
( Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sat 18 Jun 2011, 5:48,
archived)