our banking system was pretty much founded by a bunch of rich guys realising that if they pooled all their money together and then invested it collectively they can get a bigger return on interest (as there's more money to use) and then that could then be split among them.
If every one withdrew their money from the banks there isn't actually enough money in existence to cover that amount and we could bankrupt the country.
It's a system that works to make a select few a fucksite richer..
(,
Thu 7 Jul 2011, 9:17,
archived)
If every one withdrew their money from the banks there isn't actually enough money in existence to cover that amount and we could bankrupt the country.
It's a system that works to make a select few a fucksite richer..
so despite our money having written on it "I promise to pay the bearer £x-amount of said note" there isn't actually anything other than the paper to pay that with now.
(,
Thu 7 Jul 2011, 9:27,
archived)
I knew it had and so connected the dots I was aware of.
for including an unresearched error I'm now compo-ing that paragraph. :D
(,
Thu 7 Jul 2011, 10:13,
archived)
for including an unresearched error I'm now compo-ing that paragraph. :D
Sterling hasn't been directly linked to gold for a long time, but Gordon Brown did sell (at a huge loss) half of the UK's gold reserve. By announcing that he was going to sell it ahead of the sale, the market tanked. This is due to the market knowing that the sudden influx of gold would drive the price down. Gordon Brown was not a financial genius and this fuck-up cost the UK a reported £2 billion....
(,
Thu 7 Jul 2011, 11:37,
archived)
how ever you are correct when you say that there is now only paper to pay the bearer with , if mre people new and understoofd what this means then debt becomes a negative with no value at all and thus is usless as it should be now
(,
Mon 11 Jul 2011, 21:35,
archived)