errmmm
i could be wrong about this but, shouldn't the fly get bigger when you pull the magnifying glass away?
i guess that even if that were the case the pic woudn't work so well
(
real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Mon 1 Aug 2011, 9:09,
archived)
correct on both points
but I think it can be made to work properly AND look convincing if the rate of change in the fly's size is markedly greater than that of the mag-glass. (just my theory, that is) I hadn't set out to do any of that
(
LS18,
Mon 1 Aug 2011, 16:43,
archived)