trueas i say, it requires a lot of faith and i'm not a faithful type
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:15,
archived)
I just thought I'd bring it up since you were talking about "that kind of thing" and I found it interesting.There are also weird references in the Talmud to things that happened "forty years before the destruction of the Temple (70AD)".
Then again Christianity never claimed to rest on the validity of this kind of evidence.
(by the way there was no 0AD)
(Then again Christianity never claimed to rest on the validity of this kind of evidence.
(by the way there was no 0AD)
Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:22,
archived)
believe meif the various religious groups can ever get together to produce a really coherent argument, which does not involve answering questions with a simple "because", i will be more than happy to listen.
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:31,
archived)
when it comes to physical or textual evidence of the existence and lives of people,I tend to listen to scholars and archaeologists rather than religious groups. Religious groups, on the whole, don't seem particularly interested in convincing anyone except their own members.
( Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:41,
archived)
i know what you mean Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:42,
archived)
Alas, archaelogy is very bad at determining whether particular people livedunless they were extremely powerful. It's extremely good at putting things in a proper context, though, and revealing numerous biases and inaccuracies in the written record. (Dark age history is brilliant for that...)
(
boris the spider,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:44,
archived)