I'm all for it.Here's some interesting reading on that inscription
www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/nazarethlaw.html
'The Nazareth Inscription provides no evidence for Christianity or its claim of an empty tomb. It contains no new or unusual laws regarding graverobbing, the decree itself is not unique, and it has no references or direct links to Christianity of any kind. Moreover, it's date is most likely pre-Christian, its origin is not likely to be Nazareth, and its contents are not explainable even as a muddled imperial reaction to the theft of Jesus' body. To tie this to Christianity requires piling dozens of conjectures onto scores of speculations, and the rejection of a good supply of contrary indications and evidence, and none of this is either necessary or reasonable.'
(www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/nazarethlaw.html
'The Nazareth Inscription provides no evidence for Christianity or its claim of an empty tomb. It contains no new or unusual laws regarding graverobbing, the decree itself is not unique, and it has no references or direct links to Christianity of any kind. Moreover, it's date is most likely pre-Christian, its origin is not likely to be Nazareth, and its contents are not explainable even as a muddled imperial reaction to the theft of Jesus' body. To tie this to Christianity requires piling dozens of conjectures onto scores of speculations, and the rejection of a good supply of contrary indications and evidence, and none of this is either necessary or reasonable.'
Wasp Box like a nervous random stranger at a glory hole,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:22,
archived)
this hardly helps any religionover-zealous people will often try to attribute religious significance to non-related items and events, which only makes their argument falter, losing validity as it does so.
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:28,
archived)