I guess they never got your memo do you have any evidence for these conclusions you've drawn then?
I mean you've obviously been down there and spoken to each individual protestor, found out what each of them is protesting and has issue with and then inspected the contents of their lunchbox matching it up to their individual issue by the sounds of it
(I mean you've obviously been down there and spoken to each individual protestor, found out what each of them is protesting and has issue with and then inspected the contents of their lunchbox matching it up to their individual issue by the sounds of it
Clay hopes this bit is long enough to promote my websi,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:28,
archived)
I'm sorry...you've posted three lines of absolutely fuck all...
it's simple sweetheart:
1) pick a point
2) run with it
it's not hard
(,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:45,
archived)
it's simple sweetheart:
1) pick a point
2) run with it
it's not hard
I guess that's a 'no' then you seem ok with calling them all stupid and other generalisations, implying they're hypocritical without even knowing which are actually anti-capitalist protestors or which ones are just protesting change within the financial sector. and try not to take it so personally, its only a debate, chill
( Clay hopes this bit is long enough to promote my websi,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:49,
archived)
you're right...because I have not been down to St. Pauls and met every single one of these protestors, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on any proportion (small or large) of said protestors' lacking the strength of their convictions...
(,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:55,
archived)
there's nowt wrong with having an opinionbut an opinion is only as good as the accurate info you've got to form it. Don't be suprised when someone is going to ask you what you're basing your assumptions and generalisations on
( Clay hopes this bit is long enough to promote my websi,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:59,
archived)