![Challenge Entry: News into Computer Games [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the News into Computer Games challenge. See all 164 entries (closed)
( , Wed 26 Oct 2011, 10:41, archived)

There was a chap last week saying how he had to leave the protest as he had "a mortgage, wife and kids".
It's like the Glastonbury of protests.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 10:48,
archived)
It's like the Glastonbury of protests.

If you read the articles in the links above you'll see that the tents are occupied when they're supposed to be, i.e. at night. Not during the daytime when the Daily Telegraph pictures were taken - you can use thermal imagers during the day you know.
"Local councillor Matthew Richardson has been widely quoted in the press saying that the police's thermal imaging showed 90 percent of the Occupy tents are empty overnight -- but when Kingsley tried to verify the statistic, he discovered that it was unverifiable. The police denied having originated the number, and the Councillor then changed his story, saying the statistic didn't come from "official sources." The Daily Telegraph, meanwhile, is using flaky thermal cameras trained on the tents before the protesters' normal bedtime to "prove" that it's all a Potemkin village"
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 14:49,
archived)
"Local councillor Matthew Richardson has been widely quoted in the press saying that the police's thermal imaging showed 90 percent of the Occupy tents are empty overnight -- but when Kingsley tried to verify the statistic, he discovered that it was unverifiable. The police denied having originated the number, and the Councillor then changed his story, saying the statistic didn't come from "official sources." The Daily Telegraph, meanwhile, is using flaky thermal cameras trained on the tents before the protesters' normal bedtime to "prove" that it's all a Potemkin village"

i love how the press try to find any angle to demonise these people rather than address the bloody issue. I don;t know why it matters if they don't sleep there?.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 10:49,
archived)

"What do we want?"
"An end to capitalism!"
"When do we want it?"
"After I've finished my McDonald's breakfast, Starbucks coffee, had a hot shower, paid a few bills, fed the cat and put on some clean clothes!"
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:16,
archived)
"An end to capitalism!"
"When do we want it?"
"After I've finished my McDonald's breakfast, Starbucks coffee, had a hot shower, paid a few bills, fed the cat and put on some clean clothes!"

( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:17,
archived)

enter into a potentially capitalist system?
What are you - some kind of NAZI?!
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:19,
archived)
What are you - some kind of NAZI?!

I thought it was controls to be reinstated on the banking systems so that the rich/poor divide isn't so vast
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:22,
archived)

( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:32,
archived)

one over priveledged Oxbridge graduate argued with another over priveledged Oxbridge graduate over who could creep up to the lefty audience the most
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:46,
archived)


clip is here:
youtu.be/xNuUP8GX4AU
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:08,
archived)
youtu.be/xNuUP8GX4AU

fuck em with their hipster concerns and feeling they need to do something, and needing to eat and wash n'stuff
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:27,
archived)

And I'm sure there's other independent businesses they could go to. They should be aware that they are being scrutinised.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:44,
archived)

I don't think anyone feels they shouldn't have a cup of coffee.
But just go to one one of the countless independent coffee shops round there rather than bloody Starbucks.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:47,
archived)
But just go to one one of the countless independent coffee shops round there rather than bloody Starbucks.

people start complaining about them not being in their tents!
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:13,
archived)

are these IR images taken during the night or during the day?
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:57,
archived)

they assumed people might actually be focused on the bigger urgent issues rather than what logo was on their bloody packed lunch or if they stay in the tent overnight. silly hipsters
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:00,
archived)

if you're trying to make a change, then you're trying to change hearts and minds. If you're of a similar mindset, you aren't going to care because it's the message that matters.
To those whose minds they are trying to change, they'll be looking for any reason to discount this act as just whinging hippiness, because people inherently fear change unless they are the ones driving it.
If they don't think that, as "ambassadors" for their cause, they aren't being watched like hawks by those willing to twist it around, then they are naive!
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:04,
archived)
To those whose minds they are trying to change, they'll be looking for any reason to discount this act as just whinging hippiness, because people inherently fear change unless they are the ones driving it.
If they don't think that, as "ambassadors" for their cause, they aren't being watched like hawks by those willing to twist it around, then they are naive!

do you have any evidence for these conclusions you've drawn then?
I mean you've obviously been down there and spoken to each individual protestor, found out what each of them is protesting and has issue with and then inspected the contents of their lunchbox matching it up to their individual issue by the sounds of it
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:28,
archived)
I mean you've obviously been down there and spoken to each individual protestor, found out what each of them is protesting and has issue with and then inspected the contents of their lunchbox matching it up to their individual issue by the sounds of it

you've posted three lines of absolutely fuck all...
it's simple sweetheart:
1) pick a point
2) run with it
it's not hard
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:45,
archived)
it's simple sweetheart:
1) pick a point
2) run with it
it's not hard

you seem ok with calling them all stupid and other generalisations, implying they're hypocritical without even knowing which are actually anti-capitalist protestors or which ones are just protesting change within the financial sector. and try not to take it so personally, its only a debate, chill
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:49,
archived)

because I have not been down to St. Pauls and met every single one of these protestors, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on any proportion (small or large) of said protestors' lacking the strength of their convictions...
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:55,
archived)

but an opinion is only as good as the accurate info you've got to form it. Don't be suprised when someone is going to ask you what you're basing your assumptions and generalisations on
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:59,
archived)

that they're perpetuating by continuing to support them through their continued entering into the market, you mean?
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:06,
archived)

the Paul Newman's Eyes chap has got the quote he uses as the title wrong, and therefore cannot be trusted.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 11:00,
archived)

why shouldn't people be irked if the protestors are fucking off home?
It's like going on hunger strike but popping off for fish and chips when no-one's looking
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:00,
archived)
It's like going on hunger strike but popping off for fish and chips when no-one's looking

How can they possibly expect anyone to believe they have a point if they don't sleep in the cold on the pavement to prove it? eh? eh?
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:15,
archived)

next time I'll draw a picture with crayons...
I clearly have an issue with anyone lacking the strength of their convictions.
if you're going to be part of a "sit-in" then SIT IN! What's the problem with that? It shows that people are willing to sacrifice for their cause, it's the whole point of it...
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:50,
archived)
I clearly have an issue with anyone lacking the strength of their convictions.
if you're going to be part of a "sit-in" then SIT IN! What's the problem with that? It shows that people are willing to sacrifice for their cause, it's the whole point of it...