
The 'it' in the message you were replying to was 'you're a dick', this statement refering to you, that is the invisable man.
This makes the sentence read as 'Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick...' which, I'm sure, was not your intention.
You meant a more open 'Someone has shown that they're a dick...'.
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.
You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.
( ,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:04,
archived)
This makes the sentence read as 'Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick...' which, I'm sure, was not your intention.
You meant a more open 'Someone has shown that they're a dick...'.
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.
You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.