Unfortunately for you what you think doesn't constitute a sound scientific argument.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 15 Aug 2012, 0:52,
archived)
Yes but I'm right aren't I? Like when I sit on the bog and strain from a bit, but not ever really knowing for sure that it was shit comming out of my arse making that loud splash, and without using any scientific methodology at all...I just know it's shitGot the point yet, peasant?
(,
Wed 15 Aug 2012, 1:14,
archived)
That because you refuse to look at your own shit your undiagnosed bowel cancer will claim you within 3 months?
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 15 Aug 2012, 1:17,
archived)
HAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA real world lols
(
arrangedletters,
Thu 16 Aug 2012, 3:05,
archived)
It is when a scientist (me) is arguing with a toilet cleaner (you). Q.E.D.
(,
Wed 15 Aug 2012, 1:19,
archived)
No, not really. That would mean an underlying assumption that all scientists are scientfic all the time.And my occupation has absolutely no effect on whether your assertions are sound.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 15 Aug 2012, 1:24,
archived)
For a scientist you're showing a critical lack of critical thinking.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 15 Aug 2012, 1:26,
archived)