data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
Once you see that he fucked up the foot on the left and repainted it, you can never unsee.
( ,
Thu 30 Aug 2012, 14:07,
archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
I remember thinking how amazing all the details were.
( ,
Thu 30 Aug 2012, 15:38,
archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
...that he used a lens and traced the projected image?
This also accounts for the size of the painting - it's something to do with a limitation introduced by the maximum size of decent lenses that they could make in those days.
Still a good painting though - I particularly like the reflection in the mirror in the background.
( ,
Thu 30 Aug 2012, 15:53,
archived)
This also accounts for the size of the painting - it's something to do with a limitation introduced by the maximum size of decent lenses that they could make in those days.
Still a good painting though - I particularly like the reflection in the mirror in the background.