
But this is B3ta not You Tube. That is too much.
( ,
Sun 11 Aug 2013, 1:47,
archived)

Haha I said "probing."
( ,
Sun 11 Aug 2013, 2:07,
archived)

Haha I said "member."
I gently return your gauntlet to your fair palm.
( ,
Sun 11 Aug 2013, 2:14,
archived)
I gently return your gauntlet to your fair palm.

My hands were getting cold.
Yes, i have a problem with this person. I'm not calling for pitchforks or sticks with dog poo on the end. Just know and remember this person not only enjoys child porn, but creates it. If that makes me too much of a prude for this site, then so be it.
( ,
Sun 11 Aug 2013, 2:23,
archived)
Yes, i have a problem with this person. I'm not calling for pitchforks or sticks with dog poo on the end. Just know and remember this person not only enjoys child porn, but creates it. If that makes me too much of a prude for this site, then so be it.

Peter Sellers said that and I agree with him.
I didn't see the image of which you speak so I cannot judge.
Do you have a copy of this image? Or a link? I'm unsure what we're dealing with and I regret getting involved, however I'm irreversibly sucked in now.
( ,
Sun 11 Aug 2013, 2:34,
archived)
I didn't see the image of which you speak so I cannot judge.
Do you have a copy of this image? Or a link? I'm unsure what we're dealing with and I regret getting involved, however I'm irreversibly sucked in now.

Regarding your inquiry, you should probably be aware of the so-called cartoon porn law, section 62 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. For all I know, Moggy's offending drawings might be examples of the sorts of images it's criminal to possess under that law. Requesting copies is probably a really bad idea.
( ,
Sun 11 Aug 2013, 2:54,
archived)
