You're right, the background has more detailThe idea would be to go back and add that to the first sketch style if I settle on that technique.
(
gingerbenji wrote a book http://goo.gl/8UiGjd,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:29,
archived)
But the background of both pictures is just flat orange with an orange splotch.
(,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:32,
archived)
I interpreted his meaning as the shading on the dinosaurThe background itself is indeed identical
( gingerbenji wrote a book http://goo.gl/8UiGjd,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:42,
archived)
sorry, i confused matters somewhatyeah, I meant the 'colouring in bit', the content within the outlines.
this is what happens when I get bored, I make-a-no-sense...
the sketchier one, the first one. it has more movement.
(this is what happens when I get bored, I make-a-no-sense...
the sketchier one, the first one. it has more movement.
Ya What Skiddlyboop,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:46,
archived)
WhewI was afraid I was ruining a very subtle joke.
YES THE DETAIL ON THE SECOND ORANGE SPLOTCH IS TRULY EXQUISITE
(,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:51,
archived)
YES THE DETAIL ON THE SECOND ORANGE SPLOTCH IS TRULY EXQUISITE
hmmm...now you mention it... that detail is very... splotchy...
( Ya What Skiddlyboop,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 16:07,
archived)