Every moment of time exists outside of time, not simultaneously
'simultaneously' is opposed to consecutively, and that needs some kind of time extraneous to time for the moments to be consecutive or simultaneous in, which leads to the question of whether the moments in that time outside of time are themselves simultaneous or not, which leads to an endless regress and is silly and wrong.
( ,
Sun 3 Aug 2014, 18:35,
archived)