![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Audioslave album is very poor indeed. Cornell is very good with his voice, but musically its just, well not very good (I mean good chord changes, but thats was Rage, change a bit Tom you freaky headed guitar god)
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:30,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
asking him to do something different would be like asking a leopard to change its spots. I thought it was a quality record, full of strong songs, and some fucking great riffs.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:31,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
decorative cherry, isn't it?
allrecipes.iwon.com/encyc/terms/M/7516.asp
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:33,
archived)
allrecipes.iwon.com/encyc/terms/M/7516.asp
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Like to rip that fucking switch out and stick it down his throat.
My prob is with stuff like "Like A Stone". That solo is dire. I mean dire. The song is good.
The record needed 4 more months work, and not Rick Rubin producing. then it might have been a bit more weightier. Zwan's album was much better for song.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:34,
archived)
My prob is with stuff like "Like A Stone". That solo is dire. I mean dire. The song is good.
The record needed 4 more months work, and not Rick Rubin producing. then it might have been a bit more weightier. Zwan's album was much better for song.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but i wasnt a fan of the pumpkins to begin with. Fact reamins though, St. Anger pisses on everything thats due to come out in the next three years.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:37,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
the heaviest thing theyve done in years. its got more energy than anything ive heard in the last 5 years. Its just a big FUCK YOU to people that accused em of selling out and to people that said they couldnt do this kind of music anymore.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:44,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but still don't you think it starts to sound like a kinda parody of the stuff they were making... 15 (guess) years ago or so?
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:45,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
its much more modern, but the aggression is still the same. They just seem so focussed now.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:54,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
when it becomes agression for aggressions sake (dillinger escape plan anyone?) it starts to become almost manipulative in the way it plays with people who do actually feel those emotions very strongly
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:57,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Lets see what non-die hard fans think, the true test...
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:46,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
they backed their record label in suing their fans that dared to try to share their songs online. despite the fact that they were charging $50 a head on their us tour to see them.
even though they are shit, have always been shit, and will always be shit.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:51,
archived)
even though they are shit, have always been shit, and will always be shit.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
some nice use of slap back delay... delay effects are my new friends :)
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2003, 2:32,
archived)