but...
you'll notice hte picture i just posted on here is actually larger than the cropped + UN-watermarked version i posted before (the one in the newsletter). and the new one is a 300k jpg pretty much straight from my camera. the other was a 50k (85% compressed) jpg to save my adsl bandwidth.
unless i have real photoshopping-fridges skillz i think that proves it.
faggot :)
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:25,
archived)
unless i have real photoshopping-fridges skillz i think that proves it.
faggot :)
yeah but the thing is
it was in the newsletter so a possible 60000 people saw it yesterday. masturbate into something else, then take a photo when you get caught.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:27,
archived)
I'm terribly sorry, you appear to be talking out of your arse.
1) You can't spell.
2) Your shift key is broken.
3) The original image in the newsletter is larger in pixel size. [Edit: correction, no it's not - just looks that way.]
4) Crappy compression means yours is larger in file size. [This point, however, still stands.]
5) In conclusion, you are an arse.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:29,
archived)
2) Your shift key is broken.
3) The original image in the newsletter is larger in pixel size. [Edit: correction, no it's not - just looks that way.]
4) Crappy compression means yours is larger in file size. [This point, however, still stands.]
5) In conclusion, you are an arse.
oh be quiet
if you can really be bothered, actually read and consider my post.
the newsletter + all other mirrors are CROPPED versions of the original. unless i somehow drew on extra bits of the fridge for my post....
the newsletter was also smaller in file-size because it was more compressed. ie. less detail. did i also enhance it?
no more please
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:34,
archived)
the newsletter + all other mirrors are CROPPED versions of the original. unless i somehow drew on extra bits of the fridge for my post....
the newsletter was also smaller in file-size because it was more compressed. ie. less detail. did i also enhance it?
no more please
No it doesn't.
(Newsletter linky is here) - they're exactly the same.
LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!
"no more please"! Pfft! As if.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:37,
archived)
LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!
"no more please"! Pfft! As if.
but the pic you just posted
and the one in the newsletter are exactly the same
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:37,
archived)
COCK OFF
You talentless spunkmonkey... If wanking in the shower amounts to the total of your talent, then you've no place here.
Do some work of your own and then maybe people will be nice to you Herr FlangeBasket
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:39,
archived)
Do some work of your own and then maybe people will be nice to you Herr FlangeBasket
It's a bigger file size
but the dimensions are exactly the same
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:32,
archived)
I think there's a width tag in there
If you copy and paste the url, this one's huuuuuge too.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:37,
archived)
So it is.
However, considering he claimed that the newsletter one was a cropped version of his, and it clearly isn't, the point is moot.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:38,
archived)
heh
ok yeah i got that bit wrong
must have cropped it after it was mirrored. (i was trying to save my bandwidth while it was on my local machine before i uploaded it to my host (with watermark :))
the compression is still a valid point tho. so i'm not a "liar". so there.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:43,
archived)
must have cropped it after it was mirrored. (i was trying to save my bandwidth while it was on my local machine before i uploaded it to my host (with watermark :))
the compression is still a valid point tho. so i'm not a "liar". so there.
ooh yes
take another picture of it from a different angle. then we will know you're not lying and love you forever
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:50,
archived)
Sure.
We believe you.
Thousands wouldn't.
Let's see a picture of the fridge without the note, hm? Or a different picture of the note? Oh, and to make sure it's not photoshopped, let's have those letters rearranged into "b3ta" - you have the 3, t, and a; I'm sure you have a b as well.
Make sure that letter in the background's there, too.
( ,
Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:48,
archived)
Thousands wouldn't.
Let's see a picture of the fridge without the note, hm? Or a different picture of the note? Oh, and to make sure it's not photoshopped, let's have those letters rearranged into "b3ta" - you have the 3, t, and a; I'm sure you have a b as well.
Make sure that letter in the background's there, too.
Erm -- ee-whoops.
What do you know. He did! www.b3ta.com/board/1481698 . Apologies given!
( ,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:09,
archived)