good stuffgoogle whacking is addictive. BTW: I used to try and use search engines to tell the future. I'd point in two outcomes (she loves me, she doesn't love me) and see which would get the higher count. Didn't actually work. This googlemancy.
(
rob,
Thu 24 Jan 2002, 6:24,
archived)
Genius!I am currently wondering whether I should take voluntary redundancy or not. I'll just let google decide.
I'll try putting in something like "take voluntary redundancy" and "stay with this company" and abide by whatever has the most hits.
Do you think those phrases are about even odds in googlemancy. I don't want to force google towards one path?
(,
Thu 24 Jan 2002, 6:46,
archived)
I'll try putting in something like "take voluntary redundancy" and "stay with this company" and abide by whatever has the most hits.
Do you think those phrases are about even odds in googlemancy. I don't want to force google towards one path?
Google is inherently negativeI think I've found a flaw in Googlemancy. Google has a negative streak - if you search for "yes" you get 30.9m results, which is all well and good - but as soon as you put No into the great Google you get 265m results showing a negativity ratio of 8.58. Still tells me I should quit my job though, so can't be all wrong...
(
Monkeyboy,
Thu 24 Jan 2002, 6:55,
archived)
Maybe you shold phrase the questions without using postives/negatives"I stay with my job" vs. "I will take a new job"
( rob,
Thu 24 Jan 2002, 6:59,
archived)
YayGoogle still tells me I should get a new job. You might be onto something here!
( Monkeyboy,
Thu 24 Jan 2002, 7:17,
archived)