To be honestI like the way it's clean and trick-free. I can't stand busy design.
I have to say though, I hate the navigation. You should put text under the links to indicate what they are. I stared at the screen for 10+ seconds before I worked out how to navigate, others will too.
Generally ace though! Woo!
(I have to say though, I hate the navigation. You should put text under the links to indicate what they are. I stared at the screen for 10+ seconds before I worked out how to navigate, others will too.
Generally ace though! Woo!
supermoore: HUNG,
Mon 1 Sep 2003, 2:41,
archived)
YeahI know about the problem with navigation, if it comes to it I may just redesign the navigation and use the current design.
I'm not too fond of the "updates" iframe either though.
(I'm not too fond of the "updates" iframe either though.
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list,
Mon 1 Sep 2003, 2:44,
archived)
You knowwith your flash skills you could do the navigation with that, keep the same look, and have a small actionscript flash file, which downloads once in a top frame, instead of the javascript/html changing the images in onmouseover manouvers.
/my 2 pence.
(/my 2 pence.
supermoore: HUNG,
Mon 1 Sep 2003, 2:47,
archived)
I've always tried toavoid doing flash navigation with sites.
But I may do it this time.
I'll think about this time.
And when I am done, I'll be linking to your flash fear thingy, because it's great.
(But I may do it this time.
I'll think about this time.
And when I am done, I'll be linking to your flash fear thingy, because it's great.
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list,
Mon 1 Sep 2003, 2:50,
archived)
Not as greatas your last effort mate. That humbles me.
( supermoore: HUNG,
Mon 1 Sep 2003, 2:51,
archived)
I think i've gone andshot myself in the foot with that one, beucase i'll never be able to top it.
( StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list,
Mon 1 Sep 2003, 2:53,
archived)