You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 18902 (Thread)

# ok.. Googlewhack HiScore?
Not sure if this is how it works but on Google.com
1. Nano: 493,000
2. Swahili: 214,000
=105,502,000,000

Is this valid?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:17, archived)
# No
You've got to have only a single result returned by Google...
That's the hard bit.

(BTW, why does my google result pages not list the number of hits for each word?)
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:24, archived)
# clarify the single result.
What do you mean by a "single result" returned by yahoo.
As in entering into the search field BOTH Nano & Swahili simultaneously?

I maybe being a bit dense about this, but I don't quite get the rules from what I've read.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:27, archived)
# The rules are
that Google should list only one result when both words are entered in the search box,
ie it says 'result 1-1 of 1'
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:34, archived)
# have you read my rules?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:35, archived)
# OH MY
now I get it, and that
"CRETACEOUS LOLITAS" whack was amazing.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:37, archived)
# I had
Tuna Escariot which clocked in at 338,611,000 points! Hoorah!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:45, archived)
# What???
I got 162 hits with "preposterous sycophant" who the hell can string a sentence together with these 2 words??? whaddafuck!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:50, archived)
# I agree
so much I'm going to sell my house.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:48, archived)
# ha ha!
pelmet fortitude

615,760,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 11:53, archived)
# Except that
Escariot isn't underlined...

The best I could come up with was "Fuck Hydrodynamically" for 25,710,300,000. I think it should get EXTRA points for being a grammatically correct two word sentance. (IE you can order somebody to "Fuck Hydrodynamically").
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:51, archived)
# FINALLY!
I managed to get one, though not stellar by any means, I was just happy to make one work.
Bohr: 184,000
Promethea: 7630
1,403,920,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:06, archived)
# Woo!
Beat my own score!

Lolitas Heterozygous for 96,432,000,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:30, archived)
# huzzah
sesquipedalian warthog. A mighty 189,410,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:34, archived)
# got it!
My whack is: "starchy didjeridoo": Oz-style googlewhacking!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:56, archived)
# Wrong!
Its "didgeridoo". Didjeridoo is NOT underlined on the google search...
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:02, archived)
# You should take
a snapshot of the "proof" google search for each entry in the records, because once google caches your pages, the whacks will be invalidated, so a dated "image" of the google results would be a good idea...
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:00, archived)
# actually,
my search still proves valid even after the fact.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:08, archived)
# Eventually
a search will throw up the googlewhack records page, i guarrantee it.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:15, archived)
# gotcha
ah.. after it's been posted to googlewhack. I see what you mean.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:21, archived)
# How about this then....
I screen grabbed it as evidence...

news: 169,000,000
the: 2,460,000,000
Score of: 415,740,000,000,000,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:52, archived)
# I think not...
is that windows xp i see?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:59, archived)
# It is.
And I might have photoshopped my screengrab...

(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 11:02, archived)