Indeed.I suppose a good lawyer would site interpret clase 3 as support for my above argument.
I'm more inclined to agree with your initial premise though. And I think my friend just below here is right too. It'll inevitably lead to a progressive increase of infertility.
(I'm more inclined to agree with your initial premise though. And I think my friend just below here is right too. It'll inevitably lead to a progressive increase of infertility.
supermoore: HUNG,
Thu 4 Sep 2003, 11:58,
archived)
Doesn't say you have a right to have kidsjust that your family should be protected.
(
butchbint,
Thu 4 Sep 2003, 12:03,
archived)
Wellit says "the family" should be protected. Does that mean a specific family already in existence, or the idea of a family should be protected, ie the physical ability to create said family.
( supermoore: HUNG,
Thu 4 Sep 2003, 12:05,
archived)
