seems to be completely retarded. If they can't create a copy-protection better than that there is no one else than themselves to blame.
that is all. g'night.
(,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 5:23,
archived)
that is all. g'night.
someone has actually created an intelligent copy-protection system.
(,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 5:28,
archived)
if you enanbled raw read/raw write and disabled error correction?
(,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 5:33,
archived)
It's almost certain someone will eventually work out a way to crack it - but I like the principle of allowing limited copying. That works for both the consumer and the producer, and doesn't require any stupid laws.
(,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 5:44,
archived)
should focus on improving their product, rather than suing everybody on the planet.
CD sound quality that isn't much better than mp3 and shit "artists" are their real problems.
Pushing for a format change to something like SACD and signing decent talent are what they should be investing their energy into.
/rant
(,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 5:54,
archived)
CD sound quality that isn't much better than mp3 and shit "artists" are their real problems.
Pushing for a format change to something like SACD and signing decent talent are what they should be investing their energy into.
/rant