![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Budget Cuts"){kind=small}
They decided that if yellow dye was cheap...Then yellow onscreen colours would also be cheaper
It cost them most of the research budget to come to that conclusion
It cost them most of the research budget to come to that conclusion
From the Budget Cuts challenge. See all 747 entries (closed)
(
SarahRatt,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:56,
archived)
10 PRINT "I speak perfect English"You can see that nicely when you highlight it.
(
G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩€,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:57,
archived)
not truered x uses only red light and since your screen pumps out red green and blue then red is more economical than yellow since you have to mix colours to get yellow, red x using only one color. I would have said a black x was cheaper.
(,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:58,
archived)
but thenthey had low budgets, how could they possibly afford you?
( SarahRatt,
Mon 13 Oct 2003, 0:01,
archived)
