
I can't afford hosting, yet alone a magazine. And I didn't realise you could get sp1 on a cover cd. And I didn't realise it'd take so bloody long. I'd jsut installed over 100Mb of updates before I started on sp1 )c:
( ,
Fri 21 Nov 2003, 22:51,
archived)

but.. apparently microsoft is to stop them from distributing it
- they must love wasting money on bandwidth
( ,
Fri 21 Nov 2003, 22:54,
archived)
- they must love wasting money on bandwidth

rumour has it you can't install sp1 if you're running a dodgy copy. I'm presuming a cd copy gets round that.
( ,
Fri 21 Nov 2003, 22:58,
archived)

dunno, I`d have assumed they were just big .exe files or .cab files so it wouldn`t matter
I`ve heard of people having problems after installing SP1 (a bit like the people who patched Mac Panther (I think! know nothing about Macs at all) and had problems with firewire)
not that I have a dodgy copy of XP kicking about or anything (i.e installed)....
*whistle*
( ,
Fri 21 Nov 2003, 23:00,
archived)
I`ve heard of people having problems after installing SP1 (a bit like the people who patched Mac Panther (I think! know nothing about Macs at all) and had problems with firewire)
not that I have a dodgy copy of XP kicking about or anything (i.e installed)....
*whistle*

modified XP startup screen with an alternate boot shell so I don't have to start fiddling with reshacker. Windows update doesn't like modified boot strings or shell so I can't use it unless I turn it off. Then bloody SP2 re-replaced the dll files i'd replaced to allow the use of non-microsoft themes. Still haven't got round to sorting that again.
( ,
Fri 21 Nov 2003, 23:12,
archived)

That download took me two whole minutes!
( ,
Fri 21 Nov 2003, 23:01,
archived)