b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 2574930 (Thread)

# I think that's what the Victorians had us all think
that anything sexually stimulating is pornographic. But I don't think I agree with that else everything that you find remotely erotic is pornographic.
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 19:57, archived)
# It's all semantics really isn't it?
there's nothing wrong with pornography is there?
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 19:59, archived)
# Not if you have a clear sense of what it is
but if like the Victorians they considered anything pornographic to be filthy then it's very hard to seperate it with feelings of doing wrong or being 'sinful'.
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:02, archived)
# ok :)
I just don't really have a problem with it, I guess
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:05, archived)
# Me neither
within reason
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:07, archived)
# What about
men making love (not having sex) with swans?
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:09, archived)
# "making love" is just a euphamism for sex
or Sexual Intercourse to use it's proper term. So Men having sex with swans - err most definitely unconsenual as I would expect the Swan would rather not have some man shove his todger up it's arse. So no that counts as disgusting. ;o)
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:17, archived)
# You've obviously never seen
a man tenderly make love to a swan. You're missing out.
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:20, archived)
# or a dolphin!!
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:28, archived)
# The difference between erotica and porn
is just labelling. If it's blurred and black and white, it's erotica. If it's cheaply printed and in colour then it's porn. Anything safe enough to put on your coffee table is erotica, and therefore NO FUN at all.
(, Sun 4 Jan 2004, 20:00, archived)