No it's notand it does raise some important issues about creative license.
For example a lot of 'modern art' uses contemporary images and brands in their work- yet do not get sued for breach of copyright.
Must find examples....
(For example a lot of 'modern art' uses contemporary images and brands in their work- yet do not get sued for breach of copyright.
Must find examples....
Razor What the fuck - a sig?,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 12:23,
archived)