but this cartoon strip was highly unlikelyto be even remotely 'random' instead it would be 'wacky' possibly even 'zany'. no offense to devil duck as such but the the mashed 4 cell strips we see on here are pretty damn formulaeic (as a rule)
(
lemony,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 19:55,
archived)
fair enoughmy pedantry energy is uncommonly low
(what if "andre" had turned into a marmoset in the final frame and said the words "holistic perpetrator conquest"?)
((what if "andre" had turned into a marmoset in the final frame and said the words "holistic perpetrator conquest"?)
Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 19:59,
archived)
then i would probably have preferredunexpected or unusual
though psuedo-random might have been applicable
(though psuedo-random might have been applicable
lemony,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:03,
archived)
while we're all being so pedantic.......can you apply the word "both" to more than one object?
i.e. "I'll take both" and pick up all 3?
(,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:03,
archived)
i.e. "I'll take both" and pick up all 3?
not really ... sounds a bit oddin french you use the equivalent of "all"
even when there's just two ... makes life (marginally) simpler
(even when there's just two ... makes life (marginally) simpler
Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:09,
archived)