just the way the OS is - it is a different style with a different heritage.
The reason Windoze wins on the ease of use stakes is it is a commercial OS and has to have mass appeal - even at the expense of functionality and reliability.
(,
Sat 5 Oct 2002, 22:43,
archived)
The reason Windoze wins on the ease of use stakes is it is a commercial OS and has to have mass appeal - even at the expense of functionality and reliability.
good at selling itself. It's not as good as windows as a everybody-is-able-to-use-it-workstation, but as a server it's far more flexable than NT-servers!
But in a few years Linux will be used far more as workstations and I want to be on that train if I'll have any chance in the IT-world...
(,
Sat 5 Oct 2002, 22:51,
archived)
But in a few years Linux will be used far more as workstations and I want to be on that train if I'll have any chance in the IT-world...
Linux workstation - I know people who use nothing else. From what I've used of it it is a far more competent and intuitive workstation experiance than windoze. I never have gotten a fully functional system together myself, but distros are becoming better at hardware detection etc. all the time.
(,
Sat 5 Oct 2002, 22:54,
archived)
with soundcards and NIC's many times, but this mandrake 9.0 here just found everything!
Yeah!
8)
(,
Sat 5 Oct 2002, 23:01,
archived)
Yeah!
8)