'Why should I
when the other side thinks a stupid caricature is sufficient?'
Caricatures are made of all people involved in politics. It is then up to you as a supporter of the person under the caricature to demonstrate that this is not the case, showing all that not all supporters are indeed, 'stupid caricatures'. Typing 'loser' all IN CAPS only confirms the caricature.
'I've put up with this shallow, mindless, unoriginal stereotypical shit from the Bush haters for four years. Now it's their turn to be offended, even if it's only for one day.'
You seem to be misunderstanding 'offence' for 'confirmation of caricatures'. A more intelligent reply is far more devastating than grabbing hold of the wire fencing, shaking it and shouting 'loser'. You tend to look far better if you put forward a reasoned case.
Until you do that though, you're only confirming the caricature that you so despise.
(,
Thu 4 Nov 2004, 9:44,
archived)
when the other side thinks a stupid caricature is sufficient?'
Caricatures are made of all people involved in politics. It is then up to you as a supporter of the person under the caricature to demonstrate that this is not the case, showing all that not all supporters are indeed, 'stupid caricatures'. Typing 'loser' all IN CAPS only confirms the caricature.
'I've put up with this shallow, mindless, unoriginal stereotypical shit from the Bush haters for four years. Now it's their turn to be offended, even if it's only for one day.'
You seem to be misunderstanding 'offence' for 'confirmation of caricatures'. A more intelligent reply is far more devastating than grabbing hold of the wire fencing, shaking it and shouting 'loser'. You tend to look far better if you put forward a reasoned case.
Until you do that though, you're only confirming the caricature that you so despise.
