well if it's mostly booleanthen you should be fine for hundreds probably even thousands of rows.
(
dazzla - Just blew up his shuttle and potentially lost all pr0n,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 11:46,
archived)
grand stuff...*prepares unnesecarily long select statements*
(
lemony,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 11:49,
archived)
rows or columns...?!don`t do thousands of columns (fields man... use the correct term!), whether or not the database supports it
(
Reckless_Rik,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 11:55,
archived)
arsei did actually mean rows, thousands of fields (thanks for the correction) would be hideous to use.
( dazzla - Just blew up his shuttle and potentially lost all pr0n,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 12:04,
archived)
Technically attributesand tuples instead of rows
/splitting hairs
(/splitting hairs
dingochutney *parp*,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 12:07,
archived)