
and that it made me smile, and that he should do more.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:28,
archived)

I would infinitely prefer to receive a reply which a little thought had been put into.
People 'woo yay' everything, so it's meaningless.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:31,
archived)
People 'woo yay' everything, so it's meaningless.

but I think it still quite obviously means niceness and congratulations. You have to try quite hard to feel any other way about getting 'woo/yay'-ed, and there doesn't seem much point frankly.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:37,
archived)

More WYs
More FPs
I'm an FP whore
as you can tell by the amount I've had :)

when I post a picture I want people to look at it and think a little about what they're saying, rather than replying with the same thing that they've replied to every other post with.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:43,
archived)

it doesn't make the pic any better or worse,if i thought the pic was crap i wouldn't post it it the first place.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:39,
archived)

but answers that have been thought about are worth more and are better-remembered.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:40,
archived)

cromulent points, that I hope shall embiggen us all.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:43,
archived)

I, Attila the Bun, henceforth from this moment, resolve, nay promise, only to lay praise (or ridicule) at the feet of said deliverer of pictatorial offerings in words properly catalogued in any one of the dictionaries suppling the Queen's English.
gotta say though...woo takes less time to type
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:34,
archived)
gotta say though...woo takes less time to type

is that 'woo yay' (or any of its counterparts) are simply a cheap and way to say "I like that, that is good" without having to think about your praise or what it is you're praising, and that it's pointless to try to change 'woo yay' to something which sounds even more stupid.
( ,
Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:39,
archived)