![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and if you get a philosopher in yer cab, no tip no fare. Wide-headed cnut
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:08,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
proved you can't prove everything? or was that soeone else?
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:36,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
heisenberg? what with his uncertainty principle and all
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:38,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
uncertainty principle just tells you about things in motion. i think it was godel who proved that in any axiomatic system you can't actually prove everything, i.e. there is no proof that parallel lines never meet, you just have to accept as part of the definition. or something. but it may not have been him.
edit: freshlegs, look up here. cheers.
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:42,
archived)
edit: freshlegs, look up here. cheers.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
that for any subatomic particle, the more you know about the momentum of a particle, the less you can know about its position, and hence you cannot know both.
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:45,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
he did, and i that's fair enough.
but i still maintain that in another way, the uncertainty principle also says that you cannot know everything.
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:51,
archived)
but i still maintain that in another way, the uncertainty principle also says that you cannot know everything.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...that would be impossible to prove. By definition. Or something... my brain hurts.
( ,
Sat 16 Nov 2002, 19:39,
archived)