because it's a bloody honda underneath!you fool.
(
The Beast can't help looking at womens breasts on the tube,
Wed 16 Nov 2005, 11:10,
archived)
S'notThe 1.6's have honda engines, not the 1.4's
*I may be 100% wrong here
(*I may be 100% wrong here
wefbhweiufhweiu party,
Wed 16 Nov 2005, 11:14,
archived)
it's all old honda civic underneath, they're the best cars they ever madethe newer round ones suffer from the high quality of craftsmanship at longbridge that ensured rovers success!
actually they were crap, assembled by unionn led monkeys. One of my mates worked there as a cleaner for a summer job, £300-400 a week!
(actually they were crap, assembled by unionn led monkeys. One of my mates worked there as a cleaner for a summer job, £300-400 a week!
The Beast can't help looking at womens breasts on the tube,
Wed 16 Nov 2005, 11:19,
archived)
It's a cracking car,goes like stink for a 1.4, but it's starting to look a little tatty. if I could get another I would, but i don't want a newer Rover
( wefbhweiufhweiu party,
Wed 16 Nov 2005, 11:25,
archived)
