
I dunno. I'm no more likely to buy the stuff now than I ever was, if D. Ross is a typical user. (Not that they'd ever admit that, of course.)
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 8:29,
archived)

i mean all around the world photoshoppers of all kinds can get the images and make their own versions.
It's all about brand awareness.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 8:31,
archived)
It's all about brand awareness.

now, boy, aren't you happy to be a consumer, knowing your place in our modern corporate society? I mean, I've just finished reading michael moore's books Downsize This and Stupid White Men, so I tend to think that advertising is evolution in action. now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to McDonalds for breakfast. Not.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 8:37,
archived)

and went to see him at the roundhouse before xmas so i pretty much agree - if you look at the masses they are being sold ANYTHING by whoever shouts loudest. But there's an e-generation that pretty much ignores ads and, thanks to spam and pop-ups etc, will in some cases postiviely avoid products because of adverts or bad pr or net ettiquete, so yes advertising is having to change to try and deal with it.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 8:50,
archived)