b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 6337638 (Thread)

# Oh shit!
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:10, archived)
# That would be
disappointing/mentally scarring...

Incidentally, what type of tree is that, and why is it always associated with family trees when that particular tree looks no more like the outcome of a family tree than any other tree...

?
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:15, archived)
# a damn fine question
to which the answer can only be "wibble".
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:18, archived)
# Ah...
The notorious wibble tree...
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:20, archived)
#
Because its pwetty.
Is it some sort of oak?
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:19, archived)
# yes
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:21, archived)
# I haven't the
foggiest idea... I want to say larch, just because I like the sound of it in my head... But I don't think it's a larch.

Larch...
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:21, archived)
# I (want to) believe
that it is an Oak tree
:)
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:20, archived)
# Bah, you win this round
Botany Boy, but we're still no closer as to why the oak is associated with family trees...
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:23, archived)
#
Because it looks more like a family tree then this one:
www.picture-newsletter.com/tree/tree-08.jpg
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:27, archived)
# Hahaha
It's an inbred family tree :)
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:28, archived)
# No. 3
The Larch.
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:25, archived)
# Llllllllaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrccccccccccchhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
That is all...
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:27, archived)
# that would be
No. 2

/pedant
(, Sat 16 Sep 2006, 20:38, archived)