b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 6374418 (Thread)

# I dunno...
I like it. I mean, why can't we give THEM the occasional wank?

/pron talk
(, Wed 27 Sep 2006, 22:15, archived)
# *lights pipe and reclines*
an interesting arguement.

I refer the honorable gentleman to Section 543C of the "acceptable sexual practices legistlation of 1993" which states: "wanking is an occupation to be partaken of by the male of the species only; any, so called, "ladywank" is an unacceptable practice and is punishable by testicle removal."
(, Wed 27 Sep 2006, 22:19, archived)
# Your women have testicles?
(, Wed 27 Sep 2006, 22:20, archived)
# On Planet DevilDuck
EVERYONE has testicles... just below the chin.
(, Wed 27 Sep 2006, 22:21, archived)
# ...yes.

...dont tell me i've got this whole "women" business wrong...
(, Wed 27 Sep 2006, 22:21, archived)
# APPEALED 1997
with the advent of the feminine Dramedy, "Sex and the City". Wherein, the female of the species hereforeto is granted the equality of aforementioned "wank".

Whereby the woman, hoever, must make the circumstance sexier during said action to a factor of 12.


-honorable gentleman codes Section 543c-A

Also a big highlight that year: ANY actress with a gratutious standing of "5 or less is hereby barred, disbanded and disqualified from committing any on screen lesbian activity. The purpose being to continue the illusion.
(, Wed 27 Sep 2006, 22:26, archived)