
What you have to realise is what infringements he made himself in making the image.
But at the end of the day, he has more rights to the image that Zoo/EMAP.
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 19:11,
archived)
But at the end of the day, he has more rights to the image that Zoo/EMAP.

of 'fair use' providing the image is being used for the purposes of parody. Hence the existence of Private Eye magazine. If they had any of their images nicked by Zoo, I imagine they'd get quite litigious quite quickly...
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 19:15,
archived)

Oh and it's worth looking into these ppl
creativecommons.org/license/
and popping it in your profile.
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 19:30,
archived)
creativecommons.org/license/
and popping it in your profile.