'simply changing the text on a source picture that has been used many times before gets on people's nerves. We would much rather see what the dark recesses of your imagination can produce instead.'


(,
Fri 4 May 2007, 13:16,
archived)


and jumping on someone for something that another person got woos for doesn't create a happy board atmosphere
(,
Fri 4 May 2007, 13:18,
archived)
but would tentatively add that you're not fluffy 100% of the time . . .


(,
Fri 4 May 2007, 13:20,
archived)


and i reserve the right to be a miserable cunt
but (i hope) i flame only the deserving - there maybe a few people who get caught in the crossfire, but generally i mean well.
(,
Fri 4 May 2007, 13:22,
archived)
but (i hope) i flame only the deserving - there maybe a few people who get caught in the crossfire, but generally i mean well.
the people you think deserve . . . even when you're a bit grumpy because the postman didn't deliver your 'special' dvds that morning?
I vote for 100% fluff, 100% of the time! yes, yes, I know I'm not . . . but I'm trying


(,
Fri 4 May 2007, 13:25,
archived)
I vote for 100% fluff, 100% of the time! yes, yes, I know I'm not . . . but I'm trying


*fluffs*
and they aren't DVDs they're maga...i've said too much
(,
Fri 4 May 2007, 13:27,
archived)
and they aren't DVDs they're maga...i've said too much