ignore. People are not quite correct in saying that you give up copyright in these cases. They are nut user submitted images ( as mentioned in their terms ) but solicited content. My personal view is that if they could give expensive prizes to 'readers' for submitting our work then why can't they offer the same to us when they solicit it?
It's up to you but the more b3tans cave to seeing their name in zoo then the less likely zoo will ever realize that they don't get fuck all for fuck all.
It's the principle.
(,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 13:12,
archived)
It's up to you but the more b3tans cave to seeing their name in zoo then the less likely zoo will ever realize that they don't get fuck all for fuck all.
It's the principle.
i think a fuck off was on the cards anyway, but i just wanted a quick gauge of opinion.
(,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 13:24,
archived)
TGA, ghosty, toasty and basically the usual suspects who got thieved a lot with the idea of a e-meet to discuss writing a collaborative letter on behalf of b3ta explaining that this idea of theirs is never going to take off but if emap want to enter into discussion that we at b3ta might consider contributing to their mags with due credit, retention of IP rights and some agreeable form of compensatory offer.
(,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 13:31,
archived)
You know, someone that knows what they're doing with that kind of thing.
(,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 13:33,
archived)
But I'd only consider that something worth doing if we were at a point where they were at least open to discussion about it. You need to get a discourse going first. And contrary to the impression we give myself, GA and a fair few others here are quite business and legal savvy.
(,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 13:41,
archived)