And no one thought to tell me this
When I posted the FIRST one? :P
Thanks anyway, I'll definitely be GIFing from now on if that's the case.
( ,
Sun 9 Sep 2007, 2:37,
archived)
Thanks anyway, I'll definitely be GIFing from now on if that's the case.
With simple colours like the ones you find in paint,
you can save as a gif.
This isn't the case with more complicated images, like photographs.
See here: www.lemony.co.uk/optimisation.htm
( ,
Sun 9 Sep 2007, 2:38,
archived)
This isn't the case with more complicated images, like photographs.
See here: www.lemony.co.uk/optimisation.htm
I still always hesitate to open that site because the name
is so much like lemonparty
( ,
Sun 9 Sep 2007, 4:38,
archived)
size nazism is good
sometimes...
why gif?
why not png which is even smaller in this case?
why bother to gain a few kB?
it's not about size, it's about losing image details
biatches
( ,
Sun 9 Sep 2007, 6:16,
archived)
why gif?
why not png which is even smaller in this case?
why bother to gain a few kB?
it's not about size, it's about losing image details
biatches
if you've made something in paint
which doesn't have anything copypasted from an external source, you won't lose any details saving it as a gif, cos it uses the 16 default palette colours for optimisation. you would lose more details saving it as a jpeg
the size difference between png and gif would be negligable.
it's always good to have smaller image sizes to save on bandwidth because: a) some people have slow connections (people do still use dial-up) and b) some people have limited bandwidth, and even though it's only a few kB, if everyone was making big images, and with a few reloads of the page it all adds up.
and what it is about, it the joke anyway, not the image details.
( ,
Sun 9 Sep 2007, 7:34,
archived)
the size difference between png and gif would be negligable.
it's always good to have smaller image sizes to save on bandwidth because: a) some people have slow connections (people do still use dial-up) and b) some people have limited bandwidth, and even though it's only a few kB, if everyone was making big images, and with a few reloads of the page it all adds up.
and what it is about, it the joke anyway, not the image details.