but if not - I saw that cat game is mentioned in .net magazine this month.
(,
Mon 26 Nov 2001, 6:39,
archived)
woo.
Never read the internet magazines.
Find them really out of date - and inessential.
I wonder if a high frequency publication would be better. i.e. "weekly net round up" thing...
dunno... no one else thinks it would be a good idea.
(,
Mon 26 Nov 2001, 6:51,
archived)
Never read the internet magazines.
Find them really out of date - and inessential.
I wonder if a high frequency publication would be better. i.e. "weekly net round up" thing...
dunno... no one else thinks it would be a good idea.
did get into the Guardian's 'week on the net section on Saturday'.
Apparantly there's some sort of 'image manipulation' craze on the internet, but I'll believe it when I see it.
(,
Mon 26 Nov 2001, 8:01,
archived)
Apparantly there's some sort of 'image manipulation' craze on the internet, but I'll believe it when I see it.
just lifted their scoop from wired.
arse. if this means we're fashionable - then we'll become unfashionable next week.
anybody got a good idea for a new trend to attach ourselves to?
(,
Mon 26 Nov 2001, 8:09,
archived)
arse. if this means we're fashionable - then we'll become unfashionable next week.
anybody got a good idea for a new trend to attach ourselves to?
or whaling. Or both.
I don't know, I just watch ducks.
Maybe one day it'll become fashionable.
(,
Mon 26 Nov 2001, 8:15,
archived)
I don't know, I just watch ducks.
Maybe one day it'll become fashionable.
what about the trend of nicking stories from wired (or perhaps poking people's bums with large plastic fingers... GOOSE! )
(,
Mon 26 Nov 2001, 8:33,
archived)