Am I mistakenor does copyright law contain provisions for 'fair use', one of which is the use of images and likenesses for the purpose of parody?
(
man/child/goblin should be old enough to know better by now,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:17,
archived)
That symbol is a trademark I'm sure,we can't use it without his permission.
(
Master Of Turnips. Only gays and morons believe in ghosts.,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:18,
archived)
Wankers.I'd say that if there was still anyone out there on the planet that had the slightest respect for that jumped-up self-promoting one-man hype machine, then there isn't any more...
( man/child/goblin should be old enough to know better by now,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:19,
archived)
What a load of smelly bollocks copyright law is.And that's all I have to say on the subject.
The Coast Of Yemen,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:22,
archived)
what a load of smelly *Prince* bollocks
mr horrible up yours, dickface,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:25,
archived)
Also,I was under the impression that to infringe a trademark, you had to be using it to promote a similiar trade or service to the one it is registered for in the first place. Since no-one here appears to be using it in association with any business of any sort then where is the infringement?
( man/child/goblin should be old enough to know better by now,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:26,
archived)
depends on the country...I doubt A) anyone on here needs to be worried about being sued, it's a waste of money. and b)pwnership and copyright of the images can be proved anyway...
( mr horrible up yours, dickface,
Tue 13 Nov 2007, 22:19,
archived)