He's correct though.b3ta does not operate a generic NSFW policy, it relies on self-policing to ensure that images posted can not be mistaken as porn by people passing your monitor.
What you are having a problem with is your personal moral outrage which has nothing to do with b3ta and it's policy on images. Sorry but that's just the way it is.
(What you are having a problem with is your personal moral outrage which has nothing to do with b3ta and it's policy on images. Sorry but that's just the way it is.
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Fri 18 Jan 2008, 18:19,
archived)
well, if you think the only images that are NSFW are "porny"or that our bosses derive their moral stance from an online FAQ...
i don't know what to say.
(,
Fri 18 Jan 2008, 18:25,
archived)
i don't know what to say.
An online FAQ can only make general guidelines,since each employer is different.
If you truly feel that any kind of nudity is for your situation NSFW then keep off the net while at work.
(If you truly feel that any kind of nudity is for your situation NSFW then keep off the net while at work.
Dixipoos Bye Bye Blackbird,
Fri 18 Jan 2008, 18:36,
archived)
NO I have not said that.Many images are not safe for work but here on b3ta only those containing porn are asked to be linked. If you have a problem with the content on b3ta that could get you into trouble with your employer then here's a plan? Go earn your wages and stop fucking around on the net
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Fri 18 Jan 2008, 18:37,
archived)