By the same logic,
A lack of evidence that there is a God is no reason not to believe in one.
( ,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:25,
archived)
if this were a court
if there were no evidence of guilt we would presume innocence but if there were no proof of guilt or innocence we would still presume innocence.
( ,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:31,
archived)
i'm not refering to legal convention
i'm refering to human instinct. in everything accept religion we require evidence to confirm the existence of something other than what is obvious.
( ,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:35,
archived)
There are many people who think it's obvious that a God exists.
( ,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:38,
archived)
thats a fair point.
i want to continue this but i have a 9am exam tomorrow on Creation to Revelation: the narrative of the bible and i should probably get some sleep in.
night all
( ,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:40,
archived)
night all