I have to agreeI doubt the actual real-life impact of slowing down Scientology websites. I can't imagine that it could be anything other than a minor nuisance for Scientology.
And regarding the idea a few have mentioned that Scientology is 'evil': I agree that it's self-interested and uses some dubious methods to ensure it's own success, but the 'evil' tag seems to imply that there's an inherently evil purpose at the heart of it, and I don't think that's strictly true. It's only evil in the same very that big corporations are 'evil'. As in, not strictly built on malicious intent, just preoccupied with their own success.
(,
Fri 25 Jan 2008, 18:56,
archived)
And regarding the idea a few have mentioned that Scientology is 'evil': I agree that it's self-interested and uses some dubious methods to ensure it's own success, but the 'evil' tag seems to imply that there's an inherently evil purpose at the heart of it, and I don't think that's strictly true. It's only evil in the same very that big corporations are 'evil'. As in, not strictly built on malicious intent, just preoccupied with their own success.
not ALL big corporationsif you could name a corporation that was to sell you a piece of crap that was potentially lethal, on the premise that it would help you, and then demand money through menaces and make you cut yourself off from your family, then yes, like that company.
(
gfreeman is only here for the beer,
Fri 25 Jan 2008, 19:02,
archived)