b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8097130 (Thread)

# I eat one meal a day around
dinner time. I may have a sandwich come lunch but never before 12. I do snack but not too much and never crap ( but I am a sucker for paté on salted crackers ).
I do not eat at all 1 day a week. This is the day I take no alcohol and just drink fruit juices.
Calorific control is now scientifically proven to help you live longer and fitter.

You however have a little problem. I think it is no more than a loss of appetite. However the stress that can be caused from this can make it worse. Make that appointment but until then try and get something simple inside you ( no, not me ) cup-a-soup or the like.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:31, archived)
# Scientifically proven?
The last I heard was that there were a few long lived communities that practised it.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:33, archived)
# Like
Japan you mean? It's common knowledge amongst nutritionists now and there are hundreds of studies, but my Lancet subscription is not up to date.
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4875614.stm
www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-10-23-bare-minimum-diet_x.htm
www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/11/07/calories.aging/index.html

Our ancestors were hunter gatherers much the same as many plains mammals now ( not that I suggest we have the same natural life span ) and I think it is well known that eating less and often is best for health.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:40, archived)
# While I can't take any of those links as anything like scientific proof,
I also can't be bothered to run a journal search.
Besides, I enjoy my food far too much to be willing to make that kind of sacrifice for some potential future benefits.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:45, archived)
# Here
www.bestsyndication.com/?q=102507_longevity_nutrition_reduced_calorie_intake_anti_aging_diet_maintained_lean_muscle_mass_in_old_age.htm

"The researchers say that is would be extremely difficult to restrict human diets to this level. They estimate that average women would typically eat 2,000 calories a day would need to eat 1,200 calories and an average man would regularly eat 2,500 calories a day would need to eat 1,500 calories. This would be the equivalent of a 40 percent reduction in calories."

Screw that for a game of imperial stormtroopers

Edit: Some stuff on Wikipedia too en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie_restriction
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:49, archived)
# I apologise if I gave
the impression that I was offering the links as proof ( saying I could not offer lancet publications I had thought I'd qualified it )
I was just showing that it is not pie in the sky. And trust me, I never starve, I eat what I want, I just remember to not gorge and not every day.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:55, archived)
# I'm perfectly willing to accept it might help you in some ways.
On the other hand, it'll be more difficult with a reduced diet to get enough of all the nutrients you need.
I expect it's possible if you're careful.
Also, I know it's difficult to get access to scientific papers without being a part of it, I'd struggle without my university access.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:58, archived)
# Actually I apologise again.
I'm not actually espousing this as a way of life for anyone. Just that It's something I took up ( being on operations in my 20's meant that calorific intake was sporadic anyway ) kind of by accident. I learned of the health benefits later in life and just continued with it. I'm not religious about it, I just ensure I won't get fat on over indulgence of food. I drink far too much beer and wine to be considered a normal case study. I'm told I look well for my age. What age I reach I am not willing to make a wager on.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:12, archived)
# There was a study
Reduced calorie intake in rats (or maybe mice) increased their lifespan. I don't think it's been conclusively proven and definitely not for humans.

The reduction was quite severe too. It wasn't just "eat sensibly two times a day" but more "You'll always be fucking hungry"
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:42, archived)
# Fair enough.
I'm going to remain sceptical. And decide what to eat myself.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:47, archived)
# Osaka
and btw, I have been doing this since I was 21, I'm 42 now, 5'9" and 13 stone.
It has most definitely been proven with the osaka / Hawaii ( using ex pat 2nd and 3rd generation Osakans ) studies showing the difference in aging patterns and mortality rates. Plus it works for me. Not a soul I meet believes I am more than 10 years less than my actual age unless I'm just climbing off their couch after a weekender.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:48, archived)
# If there's only one or two communities studied, it's very difficult to disentangle diet from social and cultural factors.
Personally, I eat plenty of food but it's mostly healthy, most of my meals tend to be about 50% vegetables.
I'm only 21 so it's hard to compare, but I'm about 6 foot and 11 stone.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:52, archived)
# I wish I could.
My body doesn't even want the other half of my cuppa. It's being generally DO NOT WANT about everything today.


*forces*
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:34, archived)
# or yogurt
easiest of the things to force down
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:34, archived)
# I don't have any.
I have salad and chicken and tomatoes.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:37, archived)
# fucking hell.
fry them up with some soy and butter. I'll come round and eat the food. You can eat me if you like but I don't promise more than a spoonful of protein.
(, Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:43, archived)