Yes, but it's free to look at,
where as the magazines are directly charging people to look at [your/someone's] work.
I'd say that was the major difference, which is what the question was.
I'm not saying neither of them are arses.
(
Kamikaze Stoat £4.09,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:44,
archived)
They'll still be earning money thanks to other peoples images.
I don't know how much money, and this issue doesn't really affect me as I'm too shit to have my work stolen.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:46,
archived)