I'm loving playing with different art styles
now ... this is 100% vector but done with
brushes made of shapes that have 50% transparency so they kinda blend.

CFB
And here's the wireframe (pretty simple really)....

(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:03,
archived)
now ... this is 100% vector but done with
brushes made of shapes that have 50% transparency so they kinda blend.

CFB
And here's the wireframe (pretty simple really)....

W/Y/H
Slight TJ: This place: www.roflemo.com/ appears to be 90% stuff nicked from b3ta.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:10,
archived)
Slight TJ: This place: www.roflemo.com/ appears to be 90% stuff nicked from b3ta.
Looks fine to me.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:24,
archived)
I'm pretty rubbish at PS and doubt that anyone is going to nick my stuff. I am interested to know how this differs from Zoo/Nuts nicking things as the site clearly aims to make money and, obviously, has not asked permission.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:29,
archived)
Also, the site isn't charging money to look at the content.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:39,
archived)
where as the magazines are directly charging people to look at [your/someone's] work.
I'd say that was the major difference, which is what the question was.
I'm not saying neither of them are arses.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:44,
archived)
I'd say that was the major difference, which is what the question was.
I'm not saying neither of them are arses.
I don't know how much money, and this issue doesn't really affect me as I'm too shit to have my work stolen.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:46,
archived)
As I said, I'm not worried about it - it just seems a bit cheeky to me.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:47,
archived)
It all gets a bit blurry though. B3ta's front page has adverts on it, and I would guess is viewed buy people who don't visit the board. Is that different to that site? There's even an Email This To A Friend option.
At what point does a posted image go outside the remit of the poster?
/stir
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:53,
archived)
At what point does a posted image go outside the remit of the poster?
/stir
I suppose with the implicit permission that they can be used on the front page if deemed worthy.
If we have nothing to do with another site, they don't have the right to make money from our work.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:56,
archived)
If we have nothing to do with another site, they don't have the right to make money from our work.
Yes, it is different. I don't see a problem with adverts (well, I don't like them but, you know). B3ta is offering original work produced by people who know what the score is when they post.
The emo site is offering stolen work to achieve an income. I think there is a big difference in principle but, as you say, the scale is small in this case.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 18:01,
archived)
The emo site is offering stolen work to achieve an income. I think there is a big difference in principle but, as you say, the scale is small in this case.
The bottom one looks like a Kevorkian Solution album cover.
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:11,
archived)
on canvas . . . framed and well hung . . .
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:13,
archived)
put the whole bag in now
don’t you ever complain
wakin' up to the papers
of the rolling kind
first thing in the morning
gettin chinese eyed
(,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:22,
archived)
don’t you ever complain
wakin' up to the papers
of the rolling kind
first thing in the morning
gettin chinese eyed

